Kay lives here

working with the web

knight

Information Overload?

image.png

I was just read­ing an arti­cle from Site­Point (via their RSS feed, iron­i­cally) about max­imis­ing your social media time. I thought this lit­tle snip­pet was kinda funny:

Be Picky: I sub­scribe to a lot of feeds (well over 60), but I reg­u­larly review what I have com­ing in, and I’m ready to unsub­scribe when I lose interest.

No mat­ter which way I think about it, “well over 60” is not “a lot of feeds”. I thought I’d take a peek into my Google Reader stats:

From your 450 sub­scrip­tions, over the last 30 days you read 14,149 items, starred 278 items, shared 14 items, and emailed 0 items.

Hmmm. I don’t even think of 450 feeds as a lot. Some of them are aggre­gated, but on the other hand some of them are sta­tus feeds (Cam­paign Mon­i­tor, Google Alerts, Face­book etc). I know peo­ple who sub­scribe to far more.

Using Google Reader, I’m able to skim through all the items and flag what I want to read – and from the stats above, 278 items flagged out of 14,149 is 1.9% – and it doesn’t take more than about half an hour. It’s one of my early morn­ing tasks and it’s some­thing I enjoy a lot.

Of course, I have a mas­sive back­log of flagged items that I want to read in more depth, but I like to think I’m sav­ing them for rainy after­noons or plane trips or something.

The con­tent of those feeds is mas­sively var­ied – from tech blogs, comic strips, food blogs and pho­tog­ra­phers to music feeds (lots of music feeds) and a sur­pris­ing num­ber of non-geek blogs.

What about you? What’s in your feed reader?

4 Comments

  1. I’m with the author of the Site­Point arti­cle. I’m only sub­scribed to 44 feeds, and I fol­low 64 peo­ple on Twit­ter (much lower than most peo­ple I know). I think the dif­fer­ence between me and you is that I read every­thing to which I sub­scribe. If I’m get­ting too much noise from some­one, I unsub­scribe or stop fol­low­ing them. Basi­cally, every­thing must have very high value. On a busy day, my time is pre­cious, so I have a selec­tion of impor­tant sources that I know will be worth my efforts.

    Note how­ever that I do have a cou­ple blog and news aggre­ga­tors in my book­marks that I check out every day too. I selec­tively pick inter­est­ing tid­bits from those, and I cer­tainly wouldn’t read every­thing I find there. On the busy days, I can skip these with­out los­ing much value.

  2. I used to be uber-junkie sub­scrib­ing to a ton of feeds and plow­ing through them every day. My morn­ing rou­tine was wake up, read feeds, eat lunch, repeat.

    Now it’s just too tough. I use http://techmeme.com for all of my major tech news. I have groups and searches for Adobe prod­ucts and com­mu­nity mem­bers and I find that I get most of the inter­est­ing news/commentary from that.

    I sadly haven’t touched my feeds in a long time. And I still feel guilty. :(

    =Ryan
    ryan@adobe.com

  3. I’m a speed-reader, so it’s really easy for me to skim over when I need to do so. Once in a while I do a mass “set sta­tus to read”. I’ve been using Net News Wire, but since they’ve really screwed up the move to the new ver­sion (com­pany decided to shut down their News­ga­tor server and forced the upgrade ear­lier than antic­i­pated, which then led to date slip­page and being kept in the dark as to what was going on with the NNW beta) …

  4. I have 450 feeds too, but like you I use the ‘river or news’ approach, let­ting the head­lines flow through quickly and pick­ing out items worth book­mark­ing for later. I can’t imag­ine read­ing every sin­gle item, and most feeds have some good and some not so good posts. I’m ruth­less about unsub­scrib­ing when the over­all qual­ity or rel­e­vance drops.