Kay lives here

working with the web

ww

IT Screen Goddess Calendar

screen goddess 1

Noth­ing like a bit of controversy…

I wasn’t going to com­ment until after the proper web site launched, but it’s been in the news now so I fig­ure I might as well. The won­der­ful Sonja Bern­hardt, who will be return­ing as a judge at the 2006 WA Web Awards, is behind the IT Screen God­dess cal­en­dar, an effort to break geeky stereo­types by show­ing 12 beau­ti­ful and intel­li­gent IT pro­fes­sion­als recre­at­ing clas­sic movie screen god­dess poses. Pro­ceeds will be going to fund groups that pro­mote IT careers to young women.

My good friend Megyn Car­pen­ter, web coach extra­or­dinare, is man­ag­ing the web site project, and I’ve been help­ing out with the pay­ment gate­way and some SEO advice. Three Perth women are fea­tured in the cal­en­dar — Megs her­self, Kara O’Halloran and Nat Brunovs.

Not every­one is enthu­si­as­tic about the con­cept. Rose­mary Lynch, a woman who I have the utmost respect and admi­ra­tion for, posted Gen­der Mind Ben­der about how it seemed a strange idea to her, and won­ders what the response would be if a man had sug­gested the cal­en­dar instead of a woman. I can def­i­nitely see her point. On the other hand, I do believe there’s some­thing to be said for the idea of women “tak­ing back” the idea of a pinup cal­en­dar, turn­ing it into some­thing pos­i­tive rather than some­thing negative.

My own issue with the project stems more from pro­mo­tion of unhealthy body image. All the women in the cal­en­dar are absolutely gor­geous, and while they might argue that they are just ordi­nary peo­ple with the ben­e­fit of great light­ing, make up and pho­tog­ra­phy, at the end of the day it is a glam­our shoot and they are there because they are beau­ti­ful. What is the mes­sage that is being sent to young girls with a poor body image — that those who are suc­cess­ful in the IT indus­try are as stun­ning as movie stars as well as brainy? While it may help girls who have a neg­a­tive view of the IT indus­try, is it putting up a men­tal bar­rier for girls who don’t feel they have “all that”? Are we try­ing to replace one harm­ful stereo­type with another?

It’s a hard ques­tion. I don’t know the answer. I do com­mend Sonja and every­one involved in the project for get­ting out there and doing some­thing pos­i­tive, and I also com­mend peo­ple like Rose­mary for stir­ring the pot and get­ting some dis­cus­sion going.

Maybe Rose, the next Perth Web Women Wednes­day should involve jelly wrestling — pro-calendar vs anti-calendar :)

10 Comments

  1. Well spot­ted in the news — inter­est­ing! Noth­ing like a bit of con­tro­versy. Nice post — I par­tic­u­larly like the “utmost respect and admi­ra­tion” part! Thanks you’ve made my day! To cel­e­brate I’ll put in an order for a “spe­cial hi-tech super-duper slip­pery as, jelly wrestling kit!”. Accord­ing to the web site it comes in 4 funky colours so I’ll order tham all!!

  2. Maybe we need one for men in the IT indus­try to dis­pel the myth that we all look 14, sit in the dark stuff­ing our faces with pizza and spend every 6th minute look­ing for porn.

  3. Uh, thats a myth? Since when?

  4. As one of the mod­els for the cal­en­dar, (month sept)
    I’d like to say in regards to body image:
    The ages for the cal­en­dar range from the youngest, 21 — over 60.There is an enth­nic­ity mix there are african, asian, sri lanka, euro­pean and white aus­tralian, and a mix­ture of body types. ALL are REAL women in IT none are pro­fes­sional mod­els. None of it is pro­mot­ing unhealthy body image. There is a mix­ture from char­lies angels to princess diaries. Dis­ney, Bol­ly­wood and Hollywood.

    We weren’t pulled together because we are ‘beau­ti­ful’ we got asked to be in it because of being in I.T.
    Sonja has done a great job, as i’m sure all of you agree. :o)

  5. hello great posts:-) just a quick word from me (sonja the screen god­dess inno­va­tor) I could talk for hours on this topic — but a quick post. Kay good point re: what mes­sage about body image — you know to me what I hope peo­ple see is this mes­sage — we are bom­barded with media images of ‘gor­geous’ women and many peo­ple invalidly try to judge them­selves on those images (which are mostly mod­els in pro­fes­sional poses) in the cal­en­dar we have taken real women wth real (sorry unreal) careers and shown that with light­ing, make up and won­der­ful qual­ity pro­duc­tion that the truth is — every woman IS gor­geous — it’s just how you see it, how the image is portrayed.

    We are try­ing to show that as soci­ety tends to admire actressess, movie stars, pop stars etc we are hop­ing that our screen god­dess images will result in an admi­ra­tion for peo­ple who really can make a dif­fer­ence to the future world — those of us in tech­nol­ogy can and will improve future lives and as such deserve to be on a pedestal and admired by soci­ety in gen­eral for what we do and will con­tinue to do:-)

  6. I mean no dis­re­spect and find the over­all idea a fan­tas­tic one, but the fact that it’s movie stills seems extremely hokey to me. Per­haps set­tings of them in action, replac­ing server parts or pro­gram­ming into the wee hours of the night.

    I for one would be will­ing to pur­chase one, but the con­tent really both­ers me. Theres no way I’d put that on my wall. Just my 2 cents, but I wish the project the best of luck.

  7. hello me again hey PS did you know EVERY shot has tech­nol­ogy placed in it. eg in megs shot her neck­lace is a usb drive, some shots have mul­ti­ple items. Work out what are the tech items in the cover shot.……

    We took items from the orig­i­nal shots and replaced them with techie ones instead. ALSO good news we WILL also be sell­ing screen savers of the shots:-) any­way I will but out (PS you are the only blog I have posted com­ments to on this topic — oth­ers I just read). butt out and leave you to your blog­ging:-) regards
    Sonja

  8. I mean no dis­re­spect and find the over­all idea a fan­tas­tic one, but the fact that it’s movie stills seems extremely hokey to me. Per­haps set­tings of them in action, replac­ing server parts or pro­gram­ming into the wee hours of the night. I for one would be will­ing to pur­chase one, but the con­tent really both­ers me. “
    Jesus Christ, grow a dick, wanker. Im good for 3.

  9. I think its a great cal­en­dar and don’t know what the
    con­tro­versy is about.I hope the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion
    isn’t as prud­ish as the ACS.Is is quite dis­ap­point­ing
    that that the depic­tion of a scene from Amer­i­can
    Beauty could be con­sid­ered exploitation.Lucky there
    were no Stormtroop­ers in the Star Wars scene
    oth­er­wise peo­ple might be wor­ried that it was
    glam­ouris­ing war.The ACS needs to chill out as
    with this type of atti­tude it is not sup­pris­ing
    that women are not choos­ing IT as a career.
    Though peo­ple have a point about body image,
    they need to remem­ber that the cal­en­dar needs to
    sell as well.

  10. what a pity ths valu­able blog stopped a month ago.

    Keep kick­ing it’s a REAL and often PAINFUL issue.

    HIT HARD!!!!!!!!